RapidInfluence Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Is strategic planning more successful if it is facilitator lead?


We've been asked this question quite often by companies and organizations both large and small who are working on strategic planning. The fact of the matter is that strategic planning is a lot of work and requires a big time commitment from someone to bring together the people, facilitate the process and get down to the actions required to implement a strategic plan.

What most people are really asking though is do I need an "outside" vs. "inside" facilitator to help me with this process?

Checking on the Web the response to this question is pretty varied and includes interesting comments such as "Boulder City Council debates paying consultants for strategic plan", which suggested it may not be affordable or may be too disruptive to the culture, to a myriad of Twitter posts and business networking comments praising the job of facilitators who had a marked effect on the strategic planning process within an organization.

Now we didn't create a comprehensive survey or study but overall and by a fairly wide margin (via a Web and keyword searching) most companies and organizations seem to have much more effective strategic planning activities when they are lead by an outside facilitator and the number of companies and individuals offering these types of services would suggest that there is plenty of demand.

The following is a list of the most common reasons and considerations given for using an outside facilitator:

  • Your organization has never engaged in strategic planning - this is probably the classic reason to engage a facilitator, simply because you need the outside expertise to guide you through the process, it's one thing to have read a book on strategic planning it's a completely different thing to have lead 100s of hours of strategic planning sessions
  • Previous strategic planning was not felt to be successful - this can be true because of the lack of experience when the planning process was initiated and is often an indication that more experience is needed to get the plan together
  • There are a number of ideas or concerns among organization members that will keep an inside facilitator from being objective enough and ending up without important concerns being fully vetted in the proccess - this is often true in organizations that are stagnating or that require big strategic changes, there will likely be people in the organization who like things just as they are and others in the organization may feel uncomfortable in challenging them in an open forum
  • There is no one in the organization whom members feel has sufficient facilitation skills or time to manage the process - sometimes people are just plain busy and given that the strategic planning process can't be successfully completed at half-speed it often times makes sense to outsource the mechanics of the planning process to ensure that it gets done quickly and efficiently.

So the next question is how do you find an outside facilitator? A simple search of the web brings back a myriad of possibilities both in terms of individual companies as well as the NFDB, which is a database of independent facilitators:

  • National Facilitation Database - http://www.nfdb.com
  • Meeting Facilitators International - http://www.facilitators.com/index.html

As well, you can ask people from your own business networks who have gone through the process to see how it went for them and ask them for the name of the facilitator who assisted them in their strategic planning process.

In the end the strategic planning process requires organization, impartiality, experience and effort.  It is possible to find those things within an organization but it is probably more likely that one or more of those will be missing such that you will get a better result with your strategic plan if the process is managed by an experienced outside facilitator.

 

Ed Loessi



Comments

Ed, I think that this is a good post and believe that the biggest factor with the inside/outside decision is that almost anyone on the inside has their own POV that will be injected to the process, intentionally or not. But moreover, if the insider has valuable insight or input, that is essentially lost when they take a facilitator role. I think we both know you can't facilitate and participate at the same time. 
 
But you also seem to blur the lines between bringing in a consultant to develop your strategy versus a facilitator to help you devise your own vision. I think these are very different approaches and activities. Personally, I feel that bringing in a consultant to develop the strategic plan feels too much like abdication of the responsibility. And rarely are those plans detailed enough to be actioned by the organization. 
 
Now, if leadership is struggling to develop their own plan, or the Board doesn't have enough confidence in what they're likely create and press for an outside consultant, then there is a bigger problem.  
 
My 2 cents.
Posted @ Thursday, October 01, 2009 2:23 PM by Glenn Gruber
I think that an outside facilitator can provide guidance and framework for the process, and if necessary pose open ended questions, but the work and the answers need to be internally created. The advantage of keeping the "work" internal is that this is also an opportunity to bond as an internal team, let all have their say and get everyone on the same page.  
 
 
 
This way you get great ownership of the result.
Posted @ Thursday, October 01, 2009 6:19 PM by Bob Dunne
I was very aprehensive the few times I facilitated planning sessions for clients. And yet each time, I had overwhelmingly positive feedback from all the participants.
Posted @ Monday, October 05, 2009 5:32 PM by Ruth Pointon
I am starting a consulting firm that offers strategic Planning. Its been my experince that effective plans come from outside. If you compare plans done both ways you can see the bias and fear to sometimes say things when its your boss or a member of your organization. I believe the problem is in handing someone that control, but I know that most planning firms do care about the quality of what they produce and the organizations input to produce it. Great article.
Posted @ Thursday, October 29, 2009 1:08 PM by Brian Tolbert
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.